Fundamental dimension Equity attribute | ARVYPeer $0.00610.00% Cap $9.09MP/E -36.0x QuantScore33/100 | BKLIFPeer $0.010.00% Cap $17.42MP/E -1.4x QuantScore46/100 | FNDMLeader $1.000.00% Cap $867.8KP/E -0.1x QuantScore47/100 |
|---|---|---|---|
1. QuantScore pillars0–100 per pillar · click a ticker for the factor breakdown | |||
Technical | |||
70/100 |
33/100 |
46/100 |
Valuation Multiples, PEG & DCF upside | 0/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 |
Health Piotroski, Altman Z, leverage & liquidity | 25/100 | 75/100 | 40/100 |
Growth Revenue / earnings growth & margins | 37/100 | 0/100 | 67/100 |
Sentiment Analyst ratings, targets & revisions | — | — | — |
2. Valuation multiples & capital pricingGreen highlight = best-in-class (lowest positive multiple) |
Trailing P/E | -36.0x | -1.4x | -0.1x |
Forward P/E (next FY) | — | — | — |
EV / EBITDA (TTM) | -34.1x | 2.3x | -0.1x |
Price / Sales | 206.2x | — | 3.1x |
Price / Free Cash Flow | -248.8x | -4.6x | -0.5x |
PEG ratio | -0.08 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
3. Financial health & solvencyLatest filings |
Piotroski F-Score | 2 / 9 | 1 / 9 | 3 / 9 |
Altman Z-Score | -3.83 (Distress) | 184.81 (Safe) | -0.86 (Distress) |
Total debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Quick ratio | 0.2x | 23.3x | 0.2x |
Interest coverage | — | — | 17.1x |
4. Growth & margins trajectoryLatest fiscal year |
Revenue growth YoY | -72.1% | — | — |
Net income growth YoY | +1.5% | -27.2% | -77.8% |
Gross margin (TTM) | 66.1% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Operating margin (FY) | -362.3% | — | 1874.6% |
FCF margin (FY) | -143.3% | — | -602.6% |
5. Trailing price performancePrice change over period |
1M return | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
3M return | -24.7% | +900.0% | -33.3% |
6M return | +62.2% | 0.0% | -33.3% |
Year to date | +369.2% | +900.0% | -20.0% |
1Y return | +408.3% | +900.0% | -55.6% |
3Y return | +45.2% | +100.0% | 0.0% |
6. DCF valuation & street consensusDCF model · analyst consensus |
DCF model fair value | $-0.0003 -105.5% premium | $0.0241 +141.0% upside | $-1.18 -217.6% premium |
Wall Street consensus target | — — | — — | — — |
Consensus stance | — | — | — |