Compare

Compare stocks side by side

Pick up to 3 companies to see where each one is stronger or weaker.

KGCRGLD

Kinross Gold Corporation

Area by area

Overall Quant Score

How does it look overall? (out of 100)

KGC

75/100

RGLD

69/100

Quality

Is it a profitable, well-run business?

KGC

9.3/10

RGLD

5.0/10

Growth

Is the company growing?

KGC

8.6/10

RGLD

8.9/10

Valuation

Is the price reasonable? (higher = cheaper)

KGC

8.0/10

RGLD

5.1/10

Risk

How risky are the shares? (higher = lower risk)

KGC

4.4/10

RGLD

6.7/10

Momentum

Is the share price trending up?

KGC

4.6/10

RGLD

5.6/10

Financial strength

Is the balance sheet healthy?

KGC

9.9/10

RGLD

8.7/10

The balanced view

Model-generated

Kinross Gold Corporation

This company scores well across most areas, with a healthy balance sheet and strong profitability, although the shares have been volatile.

Leads on: quality, valuation, financial strength

Best feature: healthy balance sheet (Piotroski F-Score: 9/9)

Watch out: shares can be volatile (Price volatility (1Y, annualised): 54%)

Royal Gold, Inc.

This company scores above average, with solid growth and a healthy balance sheet.

Leads on: growth, risk, momentum

Best feature: solid growth (Revenue growth (FY): 44.6%)

Watch out: weakest area: business quality (Free cash flow / operating cash flow: 0%)

Different strengths suit different goals — a higher score in one area doesn’t make a stock the better choice for everyone.