Compare

Compare stocks side by side

Pick up to 3 companies to see where each one is stronger or weaker.

FTVCTS

Area by area

Overall Quant Score

How does it look overall? (out of 100)

FTV

46/100

CTS

56/100

Quality

Is it a profitable, well-run business?

FTV

4.6/10

CTS

4.6/10

Growth

Is the company growing?

FTV

1.7/10

CTS

2.4/10

Valuation

Is the price reasonable? (higher = cheaper)

FTV

6.2/10

CTS

8.4/10

Risk

How risky are the shares? (higher = lower risk)

FTV

6.9/10

CTS

7.4/10

Momentum

Is the share price trending up?

FTV

6.5/10

CTS

2.5/10

Financial strength

Is the balance sheet healthy?

FTV

5.3/10

CTS

9.9/10

The balanced view

Model-generated

Fortive Corporation

This company has a mixed profile, with a relatively low-risk profile and a positive price trend, although its growth has been slow.

Leads on: momentum

Best feature: relatively low risk (Largest 1Y drawdown: -15%)

Watch out: growth is slow or negative (Revenue growth (FY): -17.5%)

CTS Corporation

This company has a mixed profile, with a healthy balance sheet and a reasonable valuation, although its growth has been slow.

Leads on: quality, growth, valuation, risk, financial strength

Best feature: healthy balance sheet (Piotroski F-Score: 8/9)

Watch out: growth is slow or negative (Revenue CAGR (3Y): -2.6%)

Different strengths suit different goals — a higher score in one area doesn’t make a stock the better choice for everyone.