Compare

Compare stocks side by side

Pick up to 3 companies to see where each one is stronger or weaker.

CTSAPH

Area by area

Overall Quant Score

How does it look overall? (out of 100)

CTS

56/100

APH

56/100

Quality

Is it a profitable, well-run business?

CTS

4.6/10

APH

7.6/10

Growth

Is the company growing?

CTS

2.4/10

APH

8.2/10

Valuation

Is the price reasonable? (higher = cheaper)

CTS

8.4/10

APH

5.1/10

Risk

How risky are the shares? (higher = lower risk)

CTS

7.4/10

APH

5.0/10

Momentum

Is the share price trending up?

CTS

2.5/10

APH

2.5/10

Financial strength

Is the balance sheet healthy?

CTS

9.9/10

APH

6.0/10

The balanced view

Model-generated

CTS Corporation

This company has a mixed profile, with a healthy balance sheet and a reasonable valuation, although its growth has been slow.

Leads on: valuation, risk, momentum, financial strength

Best feature: healthy balance sheet (Piotroski F-Score: 8/9)

Watch out: growth is slow or negative (Revenue CAGR (3Y): -2.6%)

Amphenol Corporation

This company has a mixed profile, with solid growth and strong profitability, although the share price trend is weak.

Leads on: quality, growth, momentum

Best feature: solid growth (Revenue growth (FY): 51.7%)

Watch out: price trend is weak (RSI (14): 32.7)

Different strengths suit different goals — a higher score in one area doesn’t make a stock the better choice for everyone.