Compare

Compare stocks side by side

Pick up to 3 companies to see where each one is stronger or weaker.

CESTYLLESY

Chinese Estates Holdings Limited

Area by area

Overall Quant Score

How does it look overall? (out of 100)

CESTY

37/100

LLESY

26/100

Quality

Is it a profitable, well-run business?

CESTY

0.5/10

LLESY

2.0/10

Growth

Is the company growing?

CESTY

5.7/10

LLESY

2.0/10

Valuation

Is the price reasonable? (higher = cheaper)

CESTY

0.0/10

LLESY

0.0/10

Risk

How risky are the shares? (higher = lower risk)

CESTY

10.0/10

LLESY

4.9/10

Momentum

Is the share price trending up?

CESTY

5.6/10

LLESY

4.5/10

Financial strength

Is the balance sheet healthy?

CESTY

3.4/10

LLESY

3.1/10

The balanced view

Model-generated

Chinese Estates Holdings Limited

This company scores below average, with a relatively low-risk profile, although its current valuation deserves attention.

Leads on: growth, valuation, risk, momentum, financial strength

Best feature: relatively low risk (Beta (vs. market): 0.47)

Watch out: valuation may be demanding (P/E (TTM): -10.0x)

Lendlease Group

This company scores below average, although its current valuation deserves attention.

Leads on: quality, valuation

Watch out: valuation may be demanding (P/E (TTM): -2.2x)

Different strengths suit different goals — a higher score in one area doesn’t make a stock the better choice for everyone.