Compare

Compare stocks side by side

Pick up to 3 companies to see where each one is stronger or weaker.

AXGNDXCM

Area by area

Overall Quant Score

How does it look overall? (out of 100)

AXGN

60/100

DXCM

70/100

Quality

Is it a profitable, well-run business?

AXGN

0.0/10

DXCM

8.1/10

Growth

Is the company growing?

AXGN

6.0/10

DXCM

6.4/10

Valuation

Is the price reasonable? (higher = cheaper)

AXGN

2.5/10

DXCM

5.8/10

Risk

How risky are the shares? (higher = lower risk)

AXGN

2.9/10

DXCM

6.1/10

Momentum

Is the share price trending up?

AXGN

6.8/10

DXCM

8.2/10

Financial strength

Is the balance sheet healthy?

AXGN

6.7/10

DXCM

8.6/10

The balanced view

Model-generated

AxoGen, Inc.

This company scores above average, with supportive analyst views and a positive price trend, although its profitability is thin.

Leads on: no single area

Best feature: analysts broadly positive (Target upside: 37.5%)

Watch out: profitability is thin (Return on equity (TTM): -17.9%)

DexCom, Inc.

This company scores above average, with a healthy balance sheet and a positive price trend.

Leads on: quality, growth, valuation, risk, momentum, financial strength

Best feature: healthy balance sheet (Piotroski F-Score: 8/9)

Watch out: weakest area: valuation (DCF upside: -52.4%)

Different strengths suit different goals — a higher score in one area doesn’t make a stock the better choice for everyone.